Commercials

Monday, 9 December 2013

MADIBA: A LEADER LIKE NO OTHER




The entire world has indeed stood still to honour who truly deserves honour: Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela.
Never in the history of the world has any individual attracted so much love and adoration while alive and at death like Madiba! His legacy of perseverance to achieve freedom and equality for not just his people but also for their oppressors is unparallelled. Never has such a combination of defiant spirit and humility been found in an individual. He remained defiant against the ideals of supremacists no matter their race or extraction insisting on equality of all humanity and at the same time was a great example of humility and meekness. Never before has any individual had the privilege of personally meeting all the most important people of his time and still had time for the ordinary people of the world. He was celebrating his birthdays sometimes with children only! Never before has it been seen that a man will so willingly give up the chance of a second term or even perpetually remaining in power as is always the case in Africa.

Most sadly though, amidst all the accolades and commendations, quite a lot of the lessons of Madiba's life has not been imbibed by the "Leaders" of Africa especially and the world at large. The "sit tight" syndrome and corruption is still very much synonymous with "leaders" like President Robert MUGABE of Zimbabwe and others in his class..

Perhaps the world has lost the greatest man that ever lived without a replacement!


“Death is something inevitable. When a man has done what he considers to be his duty to his people and his country, he can rest in peace. I believe I have made that effort and that is, therefore, why I will sleep for the eternity.” - Nelson Mandela 1918- 2013

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

CAN STELLA EVER GET HER GROOVE BACk?

The renewed outcry arising after the latest air crash in Nigeria about the apparent lack of safe domestic aviation practices has barely died down before another type of outcry ensued. This time it is about the recent revelation of  part of the corrupt practices going on in the aviation industry in particular and the entire Nigerian government at large. Initially the Nigerian government tried to play the victim by threatening to fish out the 'whistle blowers' but the increased public awareness of the implications of the scandal has perhaps made the President Jonathan administration to make a detour with the President appointing a three man committee to look into it and submit its findings in two weeks.



In the center of the storm is the aviation minister Mrs Stella Oduah who has been accused of approving a contract for the purchase of two armored vehicles for her office. The question on the lips of many is 'why on earth does the aviation minister need armored vehicles?' Is Nigeria in a war situation? To make matters worse, the cost of purchasing the vehicles at 255 million naira (about USD1.6m) has been discovered to be about ten times the actual cost! As if that was not enough, there are fresh indications that the whole transaction was not real and could have been staged to defraud the government of tax payers money. This is because there are no records of such vehicles in the government fleet nor was the mandatory authorization certificate to use such vehicles gotten from the office of the National Security Adviser.



True to type (as is always the case in this part of the world) neither the minister nor any official of the aviation ministry involved in the scandal has deemed it proper to resign. Instead the minister has been battling to save her job through intense lobbying and mobilization of some groups in a bid to influence the Presidency into forgiving her sins.

But the truth is that she is not alone in this, neither is corruption peculiar to the aviation ministry. There are many other government officials feeding fat on public funds without being caught. Corruption has remained Nigeria's greatest problem.

Now with an invitation from the House of Representative standing aviation committee to the minister and other major players in the scandal to appear before it on Tuesday, it is left to be seen if she like so many Nigerian government officials before her can pass through this unscathed.

Wednesday, 25 September 2013

THE NEW FACE OF IRAN, RENEWED HOPE FOR WORLD PEACE?



The ongoing United Nations General Assembly presented the new president of Iran, Hassan Rouhani with the opportunity to make his international 'debut'. And this he did with a speech hailed by many as a positive and welcome sign of global peace in the nearest future. This is despite his tactical avoidance of a meeting with the U.S President Obama after the U.S government proposed 'an informal discussion' between him and Obama earlier on.

In what may have been the most widely awaited speech at the United Nations, President Rouhani, preached tolerance and understanding on, decried as a form of violence the Western sanctions imposed on his country and said nuclear weapons had no place in its future.  



Mr. Rouhani, whose speech followed President Obama’s by more than six hours, also acknowledged Mr. Obama’s outreach to Iran aimed at resolving more than three decades of estrangement and recrimination, and expressed hope that “we can arrive at a framework to manage our differences.”
But the Iranian leader also asserted that the “shortsighted interests of warmongering pressure groups” in the United States had resulted in an inconsistent American message on the nuclear dispute and other issues.
Mr. Rouhani restated Iran’s insistence that it would never pursue nuclear weapons in its uranium enrichment program, saying, “this will always be the position of Iran.”
But he offered no specific proposals to reach a compromise on the nuclear dispute, which has led to Iran’s severe economic isolation because of Western sanctions that have impaired its oil, banking and manufacturing base.
The sanctions, he said, are “violent, pure and simple.”
The speech by Mr. Rouhani, a moderate cleric who is close to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, appeared partly aimed at his own domestic audience and was his most prominent opportunity to explain his views, following his election in June. His ascent came after eight years of pugnacious saber-rattling by his hard-line predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who regularly railed against the United States and Israel, questioned the Holocaust and provoked annual walkouts by diplomats at his General Assembly speeches.
There was no such mass walkout this time.
“We believe there are no violent solutions to world crises,” Mr. Rouhani said.
Mr. Rouhani’s visit to the United Nations has been widely anticipated for any signs of the moderation and pragmatism that he said his administration was bringing to Iran. But his speech still provoked skepticism and criticism.
Thousands of anti-Rouhani demonstrators rallied outside the United Nations headquarters, including members and sympathizers of the Mujahedeen Khalq, an Iranian dissident group that is banned in Iran and was removed from a State Department terrorist group list last year after an aggressive lobbying effort in Washington.
Pro-Israel lawmakers and interest groups criticized Mr. Rouhani’s speech as lacking specifics and echoing the themes Mr. Ahmadinejad had espoused. “Those who expected a dramatic departure are disappointed,” said Gary Samore, the president of United Against Nuclear Iran, a New York-based group that has advocated for strong sanctions against the country. “This address was surprisingly similar to what we are used to hearing from Iran, both in tone and substance.”
Mr. Rouhani never once mentioned Israel by name in his speech, although he did speak to what he called the violence perpetrated on the Palestinians. “Palestine is under occupation,” he said. “The basic rights of Palestinians are tragically violated.”
Israeli leaders, who have called Iran an existential threat to Israel, have publicly criticized Mr. Rouhani as no different from others in the Iranian government.

Wednesday, 14 August 2013

TRIBAL POLITICS




The dust raised by the recent 'deportation' of some Nigerians from one part of the country (Lagos State) to another ( Anambra State) may never settle unless some urgent steps are taken to reverse the obvious misguided action of the Lagos State government. There have been arguments for and against the action with some opinions especially in support being  quite pathetic and embarrassing to the already battered image of the country. How on earth can one justify the forced relocation of a selected few from one particular section of  the country back to their 'origin' when the constitution establishing the existence of the country guarantees them freedom to live in any part they choose?  Of course there are no other reasons except tribalism even though the offending state government has come out with a statement to deny that claiming instead that the affected persons are destitutes who were sent 'home' to reunite with their families. A simple question is begging to be answered: are these persons the only 'destitutes' in Lagos State?

It may interest the readers who do not reside in Lagos to know that Lagos State is swarming with 'destitutes' most of whom are of  Lagos state origin and from other states of the same tribe as Lagos State namely Oyo , Ondo, Ekiti, Ogun, Osun and Kwara states. One needs to pay a visit to slums like Amukoko, Olodi Apapa and the Lagos water front (kuramo beach in particular) to verify this. Why was the same treatment not meted out to the 'destitutes' from these states? Or do some 'destitutes' constitute more 'nuisance' than others?  Are they sacred cows even amongst 'destitutes'?

Come to think of it, what moral justification do the politicians have to label some citizens as 'destitutes' when these persons are clearly products of a failed socio-political system. A system destroyed by years of bad, cruel and extremely corrupt leadership. A system which now provides for a few to stupendously and fraudulently enrich themselves at the expense of the ordinary people. But for these 'fortunate' few to now turn back and ungraciously label others as 'destitutes' is to say the least heart breaking. And many of these politicians themselves narrowly escaped being on the streets!  What happened to the word 'rehabilitation' in this part of the world? The honorable thing for the Lagos State government to do would be to urgently rescind this very unpopular action that is quite retrogressive and which seeks to negate all the other laudable  achievements of the administration.

Thursday, 25 July 2013

A SILENT MAJORITY

Within the past two weeks there has been an uproar amongst the Nigerian populace against an act of the National Assembly in favour of early marriage for under aged girls. There have been arguments raised along religious, tribal and political lines on this issue. The attempt by a  majority of the lawmakers (73 senators) to delete a contradicting sub-section of the Nigerian 1999 Constitution (section 29 (4) (B) ) failed as they were not able to make the mandatory two-third majority. This sub-section states that "any woman who is married shall be deemed to be of full age''. It contradicts an older law (The Child's Right Act of 1979) which stipulates that marriage age is 18 years and above while also recommending a fine of five hundred thousand naira (N 500,000.00) or a 5 year jail term for offenders.




Sadly a group of 35 paedophiles in the Senate led by notorious paedophile Sani Ahmed Yerima  succeeded in having this clause retained to the consternation of the majority of the people. What this means is that child slavery in the name of marriage will continue to be perpetrated by this idiots who have no business being in the senate in the first instance. They are hiding under the guise of religion to carry out their sick desires. One cannot help but wonder how the affected children can then get help in a situation like this. It is also very worrisome knowing that these men are from a particular part of the country where such practices are seen as normal. How then can these fools be voted out of the senate to pave way for saner laws to be made? Your guess is as good as mine.

Thursday, 23 May 2013

BURYING THE DEAD WITH THE LIVING


17th of May, 2013, a king dies in a remote town in Oyo State, South Western Nigeria. Almost as soon as the news goes out there is palpable fear amongst the residents of the town especially non indigenes. A self imposed curfew becomes the most advisable thing to do for the residents.

An Oba

The reason: The Oba (the vernacular for a king in this part of Nigeria) as part of an age long tradition must be buried with the heads of some unlucky victims. Most times the victims are believed to be non indigenes and unsuspecting travellers who happen to be passing through the area at the time of the head hunt. And the number of victims (not that it really matters or makes any difference) are never disclosed. How barbaric! And in the 21st century?! Little wonder a lot of unsolved missing persons cases exist in this region.

It is more disturbing that this act of gross barbarism under the guise of customs and traditions is welcomed even by the educated and elite of the region who otherwise should have spoken out against it. And to think the practice is carried out also in developed cities like Lagos (a sprawling metropolis in the region) where the traditional institution holds sway despite the vast number of people from different parts of the world resident there is to say the least most absurd.

It is high time this is called what it is: BARBARISM, not custom/tradition and done away with in the interest of all concerned.

Saturday, 18 May 2013

IGNORING THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD




France has become the 14th nation worldwide to legalise same sex marriages after months of political debate and public protests. This was announced by President Francois Hollande who stated that "this law will bring reconciliation while taking nothing from anyone else". This statement could not be farther from the truth considering the fact that this same legislation also legalises gay adoptions! What happens to the rights of children adopted into gay marriages? Do these children not have the right to decide what kind of sexual orientations their foster parents should have or the kind of homes they want to be raised in? Even if the child concerned is from either of the gay couple as has been approved in Portugal, it still amounts to a gross violation of the child's fundamental human rights.

People who decide to be gay or who are 'born gay' should at least carry on with their way of life in these countries without bringing innocent children into the mess. 

Monday, 22 April 2013

THE ENEMY WITHIN

It is no longer news that the 2013 Boston International Marathon was disrupted by bomb blasts which left at least three people dead and over a hundred others wounded. Perhaps what is news now is that the two bomb suspects have been apprehended with one dead in the ensuing shoot out with law enforcement agents.



It is quite worrisome that despite the billions of dollars and precious lives already lost to the war against terrorism this is happening again inside the United States. But more worrisome to me is the fact that the two suspects were not visitors to the United States but residents who had been living there for over a decade! It could also be recalled that this was the case with some of the 9/11 executors who were also discovered to have been living in the United States for some time and had even taken flying lessons there.

The time has come for the Obama regime and indeed all other governments involved in the international war against terrorism to critically look inwards with the aim of forestalling such future mayhem. It is quite clear now that the enemy within could be more devastating than the one outside.

Saturday, 16 March 2013

THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF UNPROFESSIONAL JOURNALISM



For a whole week I kept seeing the phrase "My oga at the top" every where I looked. On the different social media, newspapers, my BBM contacts display messages etc. This phrase and whatever story was behind it had gone viral and yet I did not know what was going on! For those who do not know, 'Oga' means Boss in Nigerian Pigin English.

I made some enquiries and finally got to see the source- a live interview granted by the Lagos State Commandant of The Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps to Channels Television, a Nigerian local media house.

Of course, to be quite honest, my initial reaction to the video was an outburst of laughter but then after a short while and perhaps two to three more views it finally hit me. The high level of unprofessionalism exhibited by the two co-hosts of the program was to say the least sickening! They seemed to have forgotten they were on live TV and the interview was what it should be- an interview not a court trial! The man was bullied into ridiculing himself, his office, and the nation at large. And these are supposed to be award winning journalists who should know better on how to conduct live interviews. What happened to pre-interview off camera briefs? Or perhaps the plan from the onset was to bring the man to their studio to make him a laughing stock to create some comic relief in these hard times!

I personally think the Nigerian Union of Journalists and perhaps the Channels Television management should call these two to order.

Thursday, 14 March 2013

HABEMUS PAPAM-TOTUS HAIL NOVUS POPE!!!


We have a Pope- All hail the new Pope!!! After about three days of voting, the Conclave of Cardinals have finally elected a new Pope, the 266th in the history of the church.

Pope Francis blessing the crowd

The 76 years old Pope was before now the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio. He is now Pope Francis, the first pontiff from the western hemisphere! An Argentine son of Italian migrants, he had been the only real contender against Joseph Ratzinger in the first round of balloting that led to the election of the German as Pope Benedict XVI in April 2005.

The first non-European pope in almost 13 centuries (the last was Gregory III, a Syrian, in 731), he was Argentina’s most powerful Roman Catholic prelate and a priest who led a humble lifestyle that reflected his advocacy for the downtrodden. In Latin America, whose social inequality is one of the worst of any region in the world, that truly counted for something.

The accession of a new Pope is always cause for wonderment—if only because the papacy of the Roman Catholic Church has managed to survive more vicissitudes than almost any other kingdom in history. No other institution can claim to have withstood Attila the Hun, the ambitions of the Habsburgs, the Ottoman Turks, Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler in addition to Stalin and his successors. Every new pope pushes that longevity forward, through fresh crisis and challenge. And in the 21st century, he does so at the head of a spiritual empire that touches more than 1 billion souls and whose influence crosses borders and contends with other principalities and powers

This is truly hoping he lives up the to challenges and steers the church through the difficult times ahead.

I wish you well Papa!!

Monday, 11 February 2013

THE LIFE AND TIMES OF A RETIRING POPE




VATICAN CITY (AP) — Benedict XVI always cast himself as the reluctant pope, a shy bookworm who preferred solitary walks in the Alps to the public glare and the majesty of Vatican pageantry. But once in office, he never shied from charting the Catholic Church on the course he thought it needed — a determination reflected in his stunning announcement today that he would be the first pope to resign since 1415.
While taking the Vatican and world by surprise, Benedict had laid the groundwork for the decision years ago, saying popes have the obligation to resign if they can't carry on. And to many, his decision was perfectly in keeping with a man who had dedicated his life to the church, showing his love for the institution and an acknowledgement that it needed new blood to confront the future.
The German theologian, whose mission was to reawaken Christianity in a secularised Europe, grew increasingly frail as he shouldered the monumental task of purging the Catholic world of a sex abuse scandal that festered under John Paul II and exploded during his reign into the church's biggest crisis in decades, if not centuries.
More recently, he bore the painful burden of betrayal by one of his closest aides: Benedict's own butler was convicted by a Vatican court of stealing the pontiff's personal papers and giving them to a journalist, one of the gravest breaches of papal security in modern times.
All the while, Benedict pursued his single-minded vision to rekindle faith in a world which, he frequently lamented, seemed to think it could do without God.
"In vast areas of the world today, there is a strange forgetfulness of God," he told 1 million young people gathered on a vast field for his first foreign trip as pope, World Youth Day in Cologne, Germany in 2005. "It seems as if everything would be just the same even without Him."
With some decisive, often controversial moves, Benedict tried to remind Europe of its Christian heritage and set the Catholic Church on a conservative, tradition-minded path that often alienated progressives and thrilled conservatives.
The Vatican's crackdown on American nuns — accused of straying from church doctrine in pursuing social justice issues rather than stressing core church teaching on abortion and homosexuality — left a bitter taste for many American Catholics.
But conservatives cheered his championing of the pre-Vatican II church and his insistence on tradition, even if it cost the church popularity among liberals.
As he said in his 1996 book "Salt of the Earth," a smaller but purer church may be necessary. "Maybe we are facing a new and different kind of epoch in the church's history, where Christianity will again be characterised more by the mustard seed, where it will exist in small, seemingly insignificant groups that nonetheless live an intensive struggle against evil and bring the good into the world — that let God in," he said then.
Yet his papacy will be forever intertwined with the sex abuse scandal.
Over the course of just a few months in 2010, thousands of people in Europe, Australia, South America and beyond came forward with reports of priests who raped and molested them as children, and bishops who covered up the crimes.
Documents revealed that the Vatican knew well of the problem yet turned a blind eye for decades, at times rebuffing bishops who tried to do the right thing.
Benedict had firsthand knowledge of the scope of the problem since his old office, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which he had headed since 1982, was responsible for dealing with abuse cases.
He met with victims across the globe, wept with them and prayed with them. He promised that the church must "do everything possible" to ensure such crimes never happen again. The Vatican updated its legal code to extend the statute of limitations for cases and told bishops' conferences around the world to come up with guidelines to prevent abuse.
But Benedict never admitted any personal or Vatican failure. Much to the dismay of victims, he never took action against bishops who ignored or covered up the abuse of their priests or moved known paedophiles to new posts where they abused again.
And hard as he tried to heal the church's wounds, Benedict's message was always clouded by his wooden personal style. No globe-trotting showman or media darling like John Paul, Benedict was a teacher and academic to the core: quiet and pensive with a fierce mind. He spoke in paragraphs, not sound bites. In recent years, his declining health made him seem increasingly fragile and somewhat disengaged in public. And he was notoriously prone to gaffes, though that was perhaps more a fault of his advisers than the pope himself.
Some of Benedict's most lasting initiatives as pope — the actions he will be remembered for — focused on restoring traditional Catholic practise and worship to 21st century Catholicism. It was all in a bid to correct what he considered the erroneous interpretation of the Second Vatican Council, the 1962-65 meetings that brought the Catholic Church into the modern world.
His conservative vision is a direction his successor will likely continue given that the bulk of the College of Cardinals — the princes of the church who will elect the next pope — was hand-picked by Benedict to guarantee his legacy and ensure an orthodox future for the church.
Benedict relaxed restrictions on celebrating the old, pre-Vatican II Latin Mass. He reached out to a group of traditionalist, schismatic Catholics in a bid to bring them back into Rome's fold. And he issued an unprecedented invitation to traditionalist Anglicans upset over women priests and gay bishops to join the Roman Catholic Church.
In doing so, he alienated many progressive Catholics who feared he was rolling back the clock on Vatican II. He also angered some Jews who equated the pre-Vatican II church with the time when Jews were still considered ripe for conversion and were held responsible collectively for the death of Christ.
Yet like John Paul, Benedict had made reaching out to Jews a hallmark of his papacy. His first official act as pope was a letter to Rome's Jewish community and he became the second pope in history, after John Paul, to enter a synagogue.
And in his 2011 book "Jesus of Nazareth" Benedict made a sweeping exoneration of the Jewish people for the death of Christ, explaining biblically and theologically why there was no basis in Scripture for the argument that the Jewish people as a whole were responsible for Jesus' death.
"It's very clear Benedict is a true friend of the Jewish people," said Rabbi David Rosen, who heads the inter religious relations office for the American Jewish Committee.
During his trip to Poland, Benedict prayed at the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp — a visit heavy with significance for a German pope on Polish soil.
"In a place like this, words fail; in the end, there can be only a dread silence, a silence which itself is a heartfelt cry to God: Why, Lord, did you remain silent?" he asked.
His 2009 visit to Israel, however, drew a lukewarm response from officials at Jerusalem's national Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial who found Benedict's speech lacking. His call for a Palestinian state also put a damper on the visit.
Jews were also incensed at Benedict's constant promotion toward sainthood of Pope Pius XII, the World War II-era pope accused by some of having failed to sufficiently denounce the Holocaust. And they harshly criticised Benedict when he removed the excommunication of a traditionalist British bishop who had denied the Holocaust.
Benedict's relations with the Muslim world were also a mixed bag.
He riled the Muslim world with a speech in Regensburg, Germany in September 2006, five years after the terror attacks in the United States, in which he quoted a Byzantine emperor who characterised some of the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad as "evil and inhuman," particularly "his command to spread by the sword the faith."
Much of the outrage that ensued from Benedict's interfaith missteps was due to the Holy See's communications problems: The Vatican under Benedict suffered notorious PR hiccups, constantly finding itself slow to react to news and then reacting with muddled messages that required two or three clarifications before getting it straight.
Sometimes Benedict himself was to blame.
In 2009, he enraged the United Nations and several European governments, when en route to Africa, he told reporters that the AIDS problem couldn't be resolved by distributing condoms. "On the contrary, it increases the problem," he said then.
A year later, he issued a revision that seemed to placate liberals while maintaining church teaching opposing contraception: In a book-length interview, he said that if a male prostitute were to use a condom to avoid passing on HIV to his partner, he might be taking a first step toward a more responsible sexuality.
It was a significant shift given the Vatican's repeated position that abstinence and marital fidelity were the only sure ways to stop the virus. Benedict repeated that line and stressed that sex outside marriage was immoral, but his comments nevertheless marked the first time a pope had even acknowledged that condoms had a role to play in stopping HIV.
When he was elected the 265th leader of the Church on April 19, 2005, Benedict, aged 78, was the oldest pope elected in 275 years and the first German one in nearly 1,000 years.
As John Paul's right-hand man, he had been a favourite going into the vote and was selected in the fastest conclave in a century: Just about 24 hours after the voting began, white smoke curled from the Sistine Chapel chimney at 5:50 p.m. to announce "Habemus Papam!"
Though clearly intending to carry on John Paul's legacy, Benedict didn't try to emulate his predecessor's popular acclaim. His foreign trips were short and focused. His Masses were solemn, his homilies dense and professorial.
And he wasn't afraid to challenge John Paul's legacy when he believed his predecessor had erred.
In one remarkable instance, he essentially took over the Legionaries of Christ, a conservative religious order held up as a model of orthodoxy by John Paul after it was revealed that its founder, the Rev. Marciel Maciel, sexually abused seminarians and fathered at least three children.
Under John Paul, who had been a fierce supporter of Maciel, the Vatican's investigation into the Mexican priest had languished. But a year after Benedict became pope, Maciel was sentenced to a lifetime of penance and prayer, and in 2010 the order was essentially put under receivership by the Vatican because of a host of spiritual, financial and other problems.
He wrote three encyclicals, "God is Love" in 2006, "Saved by Hope" in 2007 and "Charity in Truth" in 2009. The latter was perhaps his best known as it called for a new world financial order guided by ethics that was published in the throes of the global financial meltdown.
Benedict's call, however, would strike some as hypocritical when a year later the Holy See's top two banking officials were placed under investigation in a money laundering probe that resulted in the seizure of millions of euros from a Vatican Bank account. The money was later released after Benedict, the Vatican's top legislator, amended the city state's legal code to comply with international norms to fight money laundering and terror financing.
The Vatican's finances though also came under scrutiny when Benedict's own butler, Paolo Gabriele, was arrested in May 2012 and charged with stealing the pope's personal correspondence and leaking the documents to a journalist. Gabriele told Vatican investigators he did so because he thought the pope wasn't being informed of the "evil and corruption" in the Vatican and thought that exposing it publicly would put the church back on the right track. Gabriele was eventually sentenced to 18 months in prison, though Benedict later pardoned him.
As soon as he was elected, Benedict moved decisively on a few selected fronts: He made clear early on that he wanted to re-establish diplomatic relations with China that were severed in 1951. He wrote a landmark letter to the 12 million Chinese faithful in 2007, urging them to unite under Rome's wing. But tensions with the state-backed church remained with several illicit ordinations of Chinese bishops without papal consent.
Within his first year, Benedict also signed off on a long-awaited document barring most gays from the priesthood in a move that riled many in the American church. But in a document welcomed by liberal Catholics, he also essentially abolished "limbo," saying there was hope to think that babies who died without being baptised would go to heaven.
And in one of his most popular acts, he beatified his predecessor in record time, drawing 1.5 million people to Rome in 2011 to witness John Paul move a step closer to sainthood.
Benedict favoured Masses heavy in Latin and the brocaded silk vestments of his predecessors. His fondness for Gregorian chant and Mozart — he was an accomplished classical pianist — found its way into papal Masses and concerts performed in his honor, some of the only times the workaholic Benedict was seen relaxing and enjoying himself.
He had a weakness for orange Fanta, small animals and his beloved library; when he was elected pope, he had his entire study moved — as is — from his apartment just outside the Vatican walls into the Apostolic Palace.
"In them are all my advisers," he said of his books in the 2010 book-length interview "Light of the World." ''I know every nook and cranny, and everything has its history."
He fed the goldfish in the pond at the papal summer retreat each day during his vacations, and once, when some lion cubs were brought to an audience at the Vatican, he bent down to pet one — no easy feat for a man of his age.
Years after he had left, colleagues from his days at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith spoke wistfully, even nostalgically of his tenure setting the course of Catholic doctrine and discipline and presiding over the creation of the monumental "Catechism of the Catholic Church" — a synthesis of key Catholic teaching.
His presentations at monthly department meetings were "magisterial," they said, worthy of the church's permanent teachings. They said he fostered a "family" inside the hallowed yellow halls of the Holy Office, once known as the Inquisition.
His real family consisted of his brother Georg, also a priest and a frequent summer visitor to Castel Gandolfo. His sister died years previous.
His "papal family" consisted of Monsignor Georg Gaenswein, his longtime private secretary who was always by his side, another secretary and four consecrated women who tended to the papal apartment.
They shared meals, celebrated daily Mass together and at the end of the day watched DVDs, especially of Benedict's favourite show "Don Camillo and Peppone," a black and white comedy from the 1950s about the pastor of a small Italian town and its Communist mayor.
Benedict was born April 16, 1927 in Marktl Am Inn, in Bavaria, but his father, a policeman, moved frequently and the family left when he was 2.
In his memoirs, Benedict dealt what could have been a source of controversy had it been kept secret — that he was enlisted in the Nazi youth movement against his will when he was 14 in 1941, when membership was compulsory. He said he was soon let out because of his studies for the priesthood. Two years later he was drafted into a Nazi anti-aircraft unit as a helper. He deserted the German army in April 1945, the waning days of the war.
He called it prophetic that a German followed a Polish pope — with both men coming from such different sides of World War II.
Benedict was ordained, along with his brother, in 1951. After spending several years teaching theology in Germany, he was appointed bishop of Munich in 1977 and elevated to cardinal three months later by Pope Paul VI.
John Paul named him leader of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1981 and he took up his post a year later. Following John Paul's death in 2005, he was elected pope by a conclave of cardinals.
If there were any doubts about Benedict's priority to reinvigorate Christianity in Europe, his choice of a papal name was as good as any indication.
Benedict told cardinals soon after he was elected that he hoped to be a pope of peace, like Pope Benedict XV, who reigned during World War I. But the first Benedict — St. Benedict of Norcia — was also an inspiration.
The 5th and 6th century monk is a patron saint of Europe and inspired the creation of the Benedictine order, the main guardian of learning and literature in Western Europe during the dark centuries that followed the fall of the Roman Empire.

Friday, 8 February 2013

THE UNIVERSITY OF LAGOS RETAINS NAME AS SHE HOLDS GOLDEN JUBILEE CONVOCATION



On May, 29th 2012 President Goodluck Jonathan while addressing Nigerians on national television to mark the country's democracy day announced a name change for the University of Lagos. He renamed the institution after Late Moshood Abiola who was acclaimed to have won a presidential election in 1993 but was denied the mandate through a very questionable annulment announced by the military authorities of the day. He later died in 1998 while still struggling to reclaim that mandate and has since then been celebrated as one of Nigeria's icons of democracy.

Despite this, the pronouncement was greeted with an uproar and stiff opposition from many both within and outside the university community. Those against the change stated arguably that there were more serious issues to be addressed in the nation and this was not necessary at this time. They also argued that the university was too old to be renamed having recorded almost 50 years of enviable history. It is presently the only Nigerian university ranked among the top ten institutions in Africa.  A case was filed against the Federal Government and is still pending.



The University this week crowned her Golden Jubilee anniversary with a Convocation ceremony releasing a total of 3,661 first degree holders (91 of these bagged first class honours) and 3,268 post graduate degree holders. The convocation was held under the old name of the University of Lagos despite alleged moves by the Federal Government to stop this. The ceremony was earlier scheduled for January 17th and 18th but was allegedly postponed due to the disagreement on name change.

Saturday, 19 January 2013

BIG BROTHER TO THE RESCUE!



True to her reputation as one of the largest contributors to UN missions in the world and Africa in particular and an enviable "big brother" in the continent, Nigeria on Thursday despatched 100 soldiers to Mali. This is the first batch of 1,200 soldiers pledged by President Jonathan to help combat the rebels in Mali. Today, Nigeria leads the world in international peacekeeping. Of the 80 countries contributing troops to over 20 global operations, Nigeria has more than 6,500 men keeping the peace outside its borders in places such as Bosnia Herzgovena, Iraq, Kuwait, Western Sahara, Liberia, Angola, Rwanda. Nigerian troops have also served in Somalia, Mozambique and Cambodia, The Congo, Chad, Lebanon, India, Pakistan (Kashmir). The key thing in global peacekeeping are the men and women risking their lives in the interest of peace. Nigeria has more of those people than any other country in the world.

Going by what a top military officer was quoted as saying, this particular move will however also help Nigeria in her fight against islamist insurgents in the nothern region of the country as some of the insurgents had been trained in Mali. Nigeria's Boko Haram terrorists, like the Malian Islamist rebels, have for years held the Northern part of Nigeria by the jugular, killing and maiming people, especially Christians in their quest to Islamise Nigeria.


Nigeria's Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Onyeabo Azubike Ihejerika, speaking at the departure of the troops for Mali, said that Nigeria is sending troops as part of its efforts to stabilize and bring peace to the region.
Ihejerika said Nigeria's mission to Mali will complement the efforts to bring about peace in Nigeria. Ihejerika said Nigeria has "evidence that some of the terrorists operating in Nigeria today were trained in Mali." Nigeria's Boko Haram Islamist extremists are blamed for attacks that killed more than 780 people last year.

Friday, 18 January 2013

HELICOPTER CRASHES IN CENTRAL LONDON


A helicopter crashed Wednesday in central London. The helicopter crashed into a crane on top of one of Europe's tallest residential blocks, killing two people as it burst into flames and threw plumes of smoke into the foggy air above central London.


Police said there was nothing to suggest a terrorism link to the crash on the south bank of the River Thames in the British capital, where 52 commuters were killed in rush hour suicide bombings in 2005.

"There was a really loud bang," said Julie Marsden, who works in an office building near the crash site which is close to landmarks such as the headquarters of Britain's MI6 international intelligence agency and the Houses of Parliament.

"We saw the crane fall to the ground and this massive plume of black smoke," Marsden said.

Witnesses said the helicopter hit the crane on top of the as yet unoccupied 185-metre (200-yard) high cylindrical block - The Tower, One St George Wharf - span out of control, fell to the ground and burst into flames, setting nearby buildings alight.

There was wreckage and debris strewn across roads close to Vauxhall train station, a major transport hub on the south side of London, which was packed with thousands of commuters at the time of the incident shortly after 0800 GMT.

A Reuters reporter at the scene said tangled bits of crane could be seen hanging off the side of the tower, the top of which was still shrouded by low cloud an hour after the crash.

Police commander Neil Basu said the helicopter was on a commercial flight from Redhill, south of the capital, to Elstree, home to famous British film studios in north London, but had been diverted to a heliport near the crash site.

He said there were 11 casualties including two dead and one critically injured.

The emergency services said the pilot was one of those killed and it was not thought anyone else was on board.

One of the dead was the pilot who has been identified as Peter Barnes, a highly experienced aviator. The other fatality was found near the wreckage and the fire service said it had rescued a man from a burning car.

The helicopter involved was an Italian-made AgustaWestland 109, the company's best selling VIP corporate helicopter, according to a source familiar with the situation.

The twin-engined helicopter can carry eight passengers.


Thursday, 17 January 2013

FINALLY, OBAMA HAS HAD IT!


President Obama has finally proposed clamping down on the ownership and usage of heavy weapons and ammunition on American soil. This is coming on the heels of the worrisome and unending series of gun violence accross the United States. Since the deadly attack by a lone gun man on an elementary school in December,2012 left 26 people dead, at least three new cases of gun violenec have been recorded leaving the white house with fewer options than the clamp down on assault weapons which are mostly used in these attacks.


Flanked by schoolchildren at the White House, one month after the massacre of 20 young pupils at a primary school in Connecticut, Mr Obama told political opponents: "We can't put this off any longer".

"This time must be different," he said. "This time we must do something to protect our communities and our kids." Declaring the protection of America's children to be "our first obligation as a society," Mr Obama added: "This is how we will be judged".

The president called for a ban on the sale of "military-style assault weapons" such as the rifle used at Sandy Hook elementary on December 14, noting that former President Ronald Reagan, the hero of today's Republican Party, urged Washington to prohibit their manufacture in 1994.

After several high-profile massacres involving 30-round ammunition cartridges, Mr Obama also proposed a ten-bullet limit. He also called for comprehensive criminal background checks on Americans trying to buy firearms, and for new gun-trafficking laws to reduce the spread of weapons across the US.

As his plans were swiftly denounced by a string of high-profile Republicans and the pro-gun lobby, Mr Obama warned supporters: "The only way we can change is if American people demand it".
He cited a letter sent to him after the Sandy Hook shootings by a schoolgirl, who said: "I know that laws have to be passed by Congress. But I beg you to try very hard". Promising "I will try very hard", Mr Obama warned that the "American people need to make sure" their congressmen approved the plans.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives is widely expected to oppose many of the measures. Yet Mr Obama's senior colleagues in the Senate, which is controlled by his Democratic party, have also warned that they will struggle to deliver his proposals through the upper chamber.
Marco Rubio, a Republican senator for Florida and potential presidential candidate, immediately vowed to "oppose the president's attempts to undermine Americans' constitutional right to bear arms." Mr Obama said in his remarks that this right must be weighed against Americans' rights to life and safety.

Tim Huelskamp, a senior Republican congressman for Kansas, said: "Taking away the rights and abilities of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves is yet another display of the Obama Administration's consolidation of power." Mr Obama also boasted, however, that he was using "the weight of this office" to immediately sign 23 separate executive orders. He commissioned research by government scientists into the potential effects of violent computer games, improvements to education and mental health services, and other tightening of existing gun control laws.
He also called on Republicans in Congress to end their six-year block on the appointment of a director to the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, to help it carry out its work regulating weapons.

The plans were based on recommendations drawn up by Joe Biden, Mr Obama's vice-president, who led a task force on gun control action after the massacre at Sandy Hook.
Mr Biden said that he had "never seen the nation's conscience so shaken" as it had been by the incident. "We have a moral obligation to do everything in our power to diminish the prospect that something like this could happen again," he said.
The challenge facing Mr Obama was demonstrated vividly on the eve of his announcement when the National Rifle Association (NRA) released a provocative television advertisement The clip, which accused Mr Obama of being an "elitist hypocrite" for trying to restrict public access to guns while protecting his children with armed officers, was sharply criticised by the White House.
"Are the president's kids more important than yours?", the 35-second advertisement's narrator asked, in a deep, film-trailer-style voice. "Then why is he sceptical about putting armed guards in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school?"
Jay Carney, Mr Obama's press secretary, said: "To go so far as to make the safety of the president's children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly".
The advertisement was condemned as "beyond the pale" by David Frum, a former speech writer for President George W. Bush, who noted that the Obamas had received several security threats. Robert Gibbs, a former senior adviser to Mr Obama, described it as "disgusting on many levels".
The NRA immediately condemned Mr Obama’s plans, saying “attacking firearms and ignoring children is not a solution”.
“Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected and our children will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy,” a spokesman said.
Aides to Mr Obama promised that he would mobilise the formidable campaign machinery that won him re-election last November in order to challenge the NRA's campaign against new regulations, which it has called "Stand and Fight".
"The president has the most exciting campaign apparatus ever built. It's time to turn that loose," Mr Gibbs told MSNBC. "If the NRA has a list [of names], then Obama for America has a bigger list."